When do referees shirk in a peer review process?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The peer-review process.
Most authors experience that “sinking feeling” when reviewers’ comments and recommendations lead to rejection of a manuscript or the need for multiple revisions. It is important to bear in mind that this happens to most, if not all, scientists. Many times the reviewer or editor is correct, and with suitable revision, a better paper is ultimately published. Sometimes it is not. The author can th...
متن کاملThe peer-review process
The peer review process has been discussed at length in most of the established texts on the scholarly communication process, such as Ziman (1968), Ravetz (1973) and Meadows (1974). These authors agree that the four main functions of the scholarly literature are dissemination of current knowledge, archiving of the canonical knowledge base, quality control of published information, and assignmen...
متن کاملNortheast of Thailand [version 1; referees: awaiting peer review]
There is an increasing trend of trans-border migration from Background neighboring countries to Thailand. According to human rights laws, everyone must have access to health services, even if they are from other nationalities. However, a small minority of health personnel in Thailand discriminate against immigrant workers, as they are from a lower financial bracket. . This cross-sectional study...
متن کاملCooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy
Peer review is fundamentally a cooperative process between scientists in a community who agree to review each other's work in an unbiased fashion. Peer review is the foundation for decisions concerning publication in journals, awarding of grants, and academic promotion. Here we perform a laboratory study of open and closed peer review based on an online game. We show that when reviewer behavior...
متن کاملA Review on the Editorial Peer Review
Background and Objectives: The editorial peer review has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the ed...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Economics and Business Letters
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2254-4380
DOI: 10.17811/ebl.5.2.2016.45-49